netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v7] rtl8xxxu: Improve TX performance of RTL8723BU on rtl8xxxu driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD8Lp47x8HOtVFBtBcp2uu3_fMyteEma5+5wr-dObWTtC1Q0PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:15:31 +0800
From:   Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
To:     Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7] rtl8xxxu: Improve TX performance of RTL8723BU on
 rtl8xxxu driver

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:21 PM Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com> wrote:
> On 8/12/19 10:32 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > This is marked as RFC so I'm not sure what's the plan. Should I apply
> > this?
>
> I think it's at a point where it's worth applying - I kinda wish I had
> had time to test it, but I won't be near my stash of USB dongles for a
> little while.

The last remaining reason it was RFC was pending feedback from Jes, to
check that his earlier comments had been adequately addressed. So yes
I think it's good to apply now.

Thanks,
Daniel