[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190813075400.11841-2-idosch@idosch.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:53:47 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
toke@...hat.com, dsahern@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
andy@...yhouse.net, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 01/14] drop_monitor: Move per-CPU data init/fini to separate functions
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Currently drop monitor only reports software drops to user space, but
subsequent patches are going to add support for hardware drops.
Like software drops, the per-CPU data of hardware drops needs to be
initialized and de-initialized upon module initialization and exit. To
avoid code duplication, break this code into separate functions, so that
these could be re-used for hardware drops.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
net/core/drop_monitor.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/drop_monitor.c b/net/core/drop_monitor.c
index 39e094907391..349ab78b8c3e 100644
--- a/net/core/drop_monitor.c
+++ b/net/core/drop_monitor.c
@@ -934,9 +934,40 @@ static struct notifier_block dropmon_net_notifier = {
.notifier_call = dropmon_net_event
};
-static int __init init_net_drop_monitor(void)
+static void __net_dm_cpu_data_init(struct per_cpu_dm_data *data)
+{
+ spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
+ skb_queue_head_init(&data->drop_queue);
+ u64_stats_init(&data->stats.syncp);
+}
+
+static void __net_dm_cpu_data_fini(struct per_cpu_dm_data *data)
+{
+ WARN_ON(!skb_queue_empty(&data->drop_queue));
+}
+
+static void net_dm_cpu_data_init(int cpu)
{
struct per_cpu_dm_data *data;
+
+ data = &per_cpu(dm_cpu_data, cpu);
+ __net_dm_cpu_data_init(data);
+}
+
+static void net_dm_cpu_data_fini(int cpu)
+{
+ struct per_cpu_dm_data *data;
+
+ data = &per_cpu(dm_cpu_data, cpu);
+ /* At this point, we should have exclusive access
+ * to this struct and can free the skb inside it.
+ */
+ consume_skb(data->skb);
+ __net_dm_cpu_data_fini(data);
+}
+
+static int __init init_net_drop_monitor(void)
+{
int cpu, rc;
pr_info("Initializing network drop monitor service\n");
@@ -961,12 +992,8 @@ static int __init init_net_drop_monitor(void)
rc = 0;
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- data = &per_cpu(dm_cpu_data, cpu);
- spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
- skb_queue_head_init(&data->drop_queue);
- u64_stats_init(&data->stats.syncp);
- }
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ net_dm_cpu_data_init(cpu);
goto out;
@@ -978,7 +1005,6 @@ static int __init init_net_drop_monitor(void)
static void exit_net_drop_monitor(void)
{
- struct per_cpu_dm_data *data;
int cpu;
BUG_ON(unregister_netdevice_notifier(&dropmon_net_notifier));
@@ -988,15 +1014,8 @@ static void exit_net_drop_monitor(void)
* we are guarnateed not to have any current users when we get here
*/
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- data = &per_cpu(dm_cpu_data, cpu);
- /*
- * At this point, we should have exclusive access
- * to this struct and can free the skb inside it
- */
- kfree_skb(data->skb);
- WARN_ON(!skb_queue_empty(&data->drop_queue));
- }
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ net_dm_cpu_data_fini(cpu);
BUG_ON(genl_unregister_family(&net_drop_monitor_family));
}
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists