[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzb8JMnLXVpgF3PcZbZz8zRCX6HNWbsnfJkankjqX3rzRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:06:07 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] btf: fix return value check in btf_vmlinux_init()
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 7:21 AM Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> In case of error, the function kobject_create_and_add() returns NULL
> pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
> should be replaced with NULL test.
>
> Fixes: 341dfcf8d78e ("btf: expose BTF info through sysfs")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> ---
Argh... Thanks for the fix! Fix the comment below addressed:
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> kernel/bpf/sysfs_btf.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sysfs_btf.c b/kernel/bpf/sysfs_btf.c
> index 4659349fc795..be5557deb958 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/sysfs_btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/sysfs_btf.c
> @@ -30,16 +30,13 @@ static struct kobject *btf_kobj;
>
> static int __init btf_vmlinux_init(void)
> {
> - int err;
> -
> if (!_binary__btf_vmlinux_bin_start)
> return 0;
>
> btf_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("btf", kernel_kobj);
> - if (IS_ERR(btf_kobj)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(btf_kobj);
> + if (!btf_kobj) {
> btf_kobj = NULL;
This is now not necessary, please drop (and don't forget to remove {}
for this single-line if afterwards).
> - return err;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> bin_attr_btf_vmlinux.size = _binary__btf_vmlinux_bin_end -
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists