[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10602447-213f-fce5-54c7-7952eb3e8712@netronome.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:41:05 +0100
From: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 0/6] tools: bpftool: fix printf()-like functions
2019-08-15 22:08 UTC-0700 ~ Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 7:32 AM Quentin Monnet
> <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Because the "__printf()" attributes were used only where the functions are
>> implemented, and not in header files, the checks have not been enforced on
>> all the calls to printf()-like functions, and a number of errors slipped in
>> bpftool over time.
>>
>> This set cleans up such errors, and then moves the "__printf()" attributes
>> to header files, so that the checks are performed at all locations.
>
> Applied. Thanks
>
Thanks Alexei!
I noticed the set was applied to the bpf-next tree, and not bpf. Just
checking if this is intentional?
Regards,
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists