netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf 0/6] tools: bpftool: fix printf()-like functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:18:41 +0100
From:   Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 0/6] tools: bpftool: fix printf()-like functions

2019-08-16 10:11 UTC-0700 ~ Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:41 AM Quentin Monnet
> <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2019-08-15 22:08 UTC-0700 ~ Alexei Starovoitov
>> <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 7:32 AM Quentin Monnet
>>> <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Because the "__printf()" attributes were used only where the functions are
>>>> implemented, and not in header files, the checks have not been enforced on
>>>> all the calls to printf()-like functions, and a number of errors slipped in
>>>> bpftool over time.
>>>>
>>>> This set cleans up such errors, and then moves the "__printf()" attributes
>>>> to header files, so that the checks are performed at all locations.
>>>
>>> Applied. Thanks
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Alexei!
>>
>> I noticed the set was applied to the bpf-next tree, and not bpf. Just
>> checking if this is intentional?
> 
> Yes. I don't see the _fix_ part in there.
> Looks like cleanup to me.
> I've also considered to push
> commit d34b044038bf ("tools: bpftool: close prog FD before exit on
> showing a single program")
> to bpf-next as well.
> That fd leak didn't feel that necessary to push to bpf tree
> and risk merge conflicts... but I pushed it to bpf at the end.
> 

Ok, thanks for explaining. I'll consider submitting this kind of patches
to bpf-next instead in the future.

Quentin