netdev - Re: IPv6 addr and route is gone after adding port to vrf (5.2.0+)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:28:41 -0700
From:   Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 addr and route is gone after adding port to vrf (5.2.0+)

On 8/16/19 12:15 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 8/16/19 1:13 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> I have a problem with a VETH port when setting up a somewhat complicated
>> VRF setup. I am loosing the global IPv6 addr, and also the route,
>> apparently
>> when I add the veth device to a vrf.  From my script's output:
> 
> Either enslave the device before adding the address or enable the
> retention of addresses:
> 
> sysctl -q -w net.ipv6.conf.all.keep_addr_on_down=1
> 

Thanks, I added it to the vrf first just in case some other logic was
expecting the routes to go away on network down.

That part now seems to be working.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com