netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: test_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+Bz6R17bassdr3xOR7rhbuw-HbdXYu-hHkxE8S2WiNrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Aug 2019 22:16:06 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: test__skip

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:01 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Let me know if you see a value in highlighting test vs subtest skip.
> >
> > Other related question is: should we do verbose output in case
> > of a skip? Right now we don't do it.
>
> It might be useful, I guess, especially if it's not too common. But
> Alexei is way more picky about stuff like that, so I'd defer to him. I
> have no problem with a clean "SKIPPED: <test>/<subtest> (maybe some
> reason for skipping here)" message.

Since test_progs prints single number for FAILED tests then single number
for SKIPPED tests is fine as well.