netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] net: phy: realtek: Add LED configuration support for RTL8211E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Aug 2019 02:37:57 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>, jacek.anaszewski@...il.com,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, dmurphy@...com,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] net: phy: realtek: Add LED configuration support
 for RTL8211E

> Yes, I believe the integration is neccessary. Using same binding is
> neccessary for that, but not sufficient. For example, we need
> compatible trigger names, too.

Hi Pavel

Please could you explain what you mean by compatible trigger names?

> So... I'd really like to see proper integration is possible before we
> merge this.

Please let me turn that around. What do you see as being impossible at
the moment? What do we need to convince you about?

    Thanks
	Andrew