[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_c3Tv=O4D18w1N-8j_KXjQ-kVwKK0k2u8OPtpQhGoY7MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 23:19:09 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
davem <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] sctp: add SCTP_ASCONF_SUPPORTED sockopt
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:58 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:02:46PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> > +static int sctp_setsockopt_asconf_supported(struct sock *sk,
> > + char __user *optval,
> > + unsigned int optlen)
> > +{
> > + struct sctp_assoc_value params;
> > + struct sctp_association *asoc;
> > + struct sctp_endpoint *ep;
> > + int retval = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (optlen != sizeof(params))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(¶ms, optval, optlen)) {
> > + retval = -EFAULT;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + asoc = sctp_id2assoc(sk, params.assoc_id);
> > + if (!asoc && params.assoc_id != SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC &&
> > + sctp_style(sk, UDP))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + ep = sctp_sk(sk)->ep;
> > + ep->asconf_enable = !!params.assoc_value;
>
> Considering this will be negotiated on handshake, shouldn't it deny
> changes to Established asocs? (Same for Auth)
ep->asconf_enable is for 'furture' asocs, and furture
asoc->peer.asconf_capable will be negotiated according to
peer ep->asconf_enable (EXT chunk) and local ep->asconf_enable.
It won't affect the 'current'/Established asocs, and the Established
asocs have asoc->peer.asconf_capable, which can't be changed by sockopt.
>
> > +
> > + if (ep->asconf_enable && ep->auth_enable) {
> > + sctp_auth_ep_add_chunkid(ep, SCTP_CID_ASCONF);
> > + sctp_auth_ep_add_chunkid(ep, SCTP_CID_ASCONF_ACK);
> > + }
> > +
> > + retval = 0;
> > +
> > +out:
> > + return retval;
> > +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists