netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] macb: Update compatibility string for SiFive FU540-C000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:16:58 +0000
From:   <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     <schwab@...e.de>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
CC:     <yash.shah@...ive.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <palmer@...ive.com>,
        <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <ynezz@...e.cz>, <sachin.ghadi@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] macb: Update compatibility string for SiFive
 FU540-C000

On 20/08/2019 at 11:10, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> External E-Mail
> 
> 
> On Aug 13 2019, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com> wrote:
> 
>> Dave, Nicolas,
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Yash Shah wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 5:36 PM <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 19/07/2019 at 13:10, Yash Shah wrote:
>>>>> Update the compatibility string for SiFive FU540-C000 as per the new
>>>>> string updated in the binding doc.
>>>>> Reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/17/200
>>>>
>>>> Maybe referring to lore.kernel.org is better:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAJ2_jOFEVZQat0Yprg4hem4jRrqkB72FKSeQj4p8P5KA-+rgww@mail.gmail.com/
>>>
>>> Sure. Will keep that in mind for future reference.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Am assuming you'll pick this up for the -net tree for v5.4-rc1 or earlier.
>> If not, please let us know.
> 
> This is still missing in v5.4-rc5, which means that networking is broken.

Andreas, Paul,

The patchwork state for the 2 first patches of this series is "Changes 
Requested". It's probably due to my advice of using lore.kernel.org (or 
something else).

I'm perfectly fine in accepting the patches are they are today but can't 
change their patchwork state myself. We would need Dave or Jakub to take 
them.

Dave, Jakub,

All tags are collected in patchwork and all should be fine on DT (Rob) 
side as well.
Please tell me if you're waiting some sign from me.

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre