netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add BTF ids in procfs for file descriptors to BTF objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:36:47 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add BTF ids in procfs for file descriptors
 to BTF objects

On 8/20/19 11:52 AM, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> Implement the show_fdinfo hook for BTF FDs file operations, and make it
> print the id and the size of the BTF object. This allows for a quick
> retrieval of the BTF id from its FD; or it can help understanding what
> type of object (BTF) the file descriptor points to.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> ---
>   kernel/bpf/btf.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 5fcc7a17eb5a..39e184f1b27c 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -3376,6 +3376,19 @@ void btf_type_seq_show(const struct btf *btf, u32 type_id, void *obj,
>   	btf_type_ops(t)->seq_show(btf, t, type_id, obj, 0, m);
>   }
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +static void bpf_btf_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *filp)
> +{
> +	const struct btf *btf = filp->private_data;
> +
> +	seq_printf(m,
> +		   "btf_id:\t%u\n"
> +		   "data_size:\t%u\n",
> +		   btf->id,
> +		   btf->data_size);

Looks good, exposing btf_id makes sense to me in order to correlate with applications.
Do you have a concrete use case for data_size to expose it this way as opposed to fetch
it via btf_get_info_by_fd()? If not, I'd say lets only add btf_id in there.

> +}
> +#endif
> +
>   static int btf_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>   {
>   	btf_put(filp->private_data);
> @@ -3383,6 +3396,9 @@ static int btf_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>   }
>   
>   const struct file_operations btf_fops = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +	.show_fdinfo	= bpf_btf_show_fdinfo,
> +#endif
>   	.release	= btf_release,
>   };
>   
> 

Thanks,
Daniel