netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: dsa: Delete the VID from the upstream port as well

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+h21hrgUxKXmYuzdCPd-GqVyzNnjPAmf-Q29=7=gFJyAfY_gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:02:22 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: dsa: Delete the VID from the upstream
 port as well

On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 23:58, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 23:40:34 +0300, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> > I don't need this patch. I'm not sure what my thought process was at
> > the time I added it to the patchset.
> > I'm still interested in getting rid of the vlan bitmap through other
> > means (picking up your old changeset). Could you take a look at my
> > questions in that thread? I'm not sure I understand what the user
> > interaction is supposed to look like for configuring CPU/DSA ports.
>
> What do you mean by getting rid of the vlan bitmap? What do you need exactly?

It would be nice to configure the VLAN attributes of the CPU port in
another way than the implicit way it is done currently. I don't have a
specific use case right now.