[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39691d93-4150-2d0f-2978-4c5c68c893eb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:41:00 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@...du.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix __ip_mc_inc_group argument 3 input
On 8/19/2019 7:25 PM, Li RongQing wrote:
> It expects gfp_t, but got unsigned int mode
>
> Fixes: 6e2059b53f98 ("ipv4/igmp: init group mode as INCLUDE when join source group")
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@...du.com>
You have identified a problem, but I don't think it came from this
commit, rather from:
9fb20801dab4 ("net: Fix ip_mc_{dec,inc}_group allocation context")
see below for details.
> ---
> net/ipv4/igmp.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
> index 180f6896b98b..b8352d716253 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
> @@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ip_mc_inc_group);
>
> void ip_mc_inc_group(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 addr)
> {
> - __ip_mc_inc_group(in_dev, addr, MCAST_EXCLUDE);
> + __ip_mc_inc_group(in_dev, addr, GFP_KERNEL);
That part looks fine.
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_mc_inc_group);
>
> @@ -2197,7 +2197,7 @@ static int __ip_mc_join_group(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mreqn *imr,
> iml->sflist = NULL;
> iml->sfmode = mode;
> rcu_assign_pointer(inet->mc_list, iml);
> - __ip_mc_inc_group(in_dev, addr, mode);
> + __ip_mc_inc_group(in_dev, addr, GFP_KERNEL);
But here, we probably want to pass both mode and gfp_t and use
____ip_mc_inc_group(in_dev, addr, mode, GFP_KERNEL):
diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
index 180f6896b98b..2459b5e3fd98 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
@@ -2197,7 +2197,7 @@ static int __ip_mc_join_group(struct sock *sk,
struct ip_mreqn *imr,
iml->sflist = NULL;
iml->sfmode = mode;
rcu_assign_pointer(inet->mc_list, iml);
- __ip_mc_inc_group(in_dev, addr, mode);
+ ____ip_mc_inc_group(in_dev, addr, mode, GFP_KERNEL);
err = 0;
done:
return err;
What do you think?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists