[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19088.1566415359@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:22:39 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Keys: Set 4 - Key ACLs for 5.3
I added a bunch of tests to the keyutils testsuite, currently on my -next
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/keyutils.git/log/?h=next
See:
Add a keyctl command for granting a permit on a key
Handle kernel having key/keyring ACLs
I've added manpages to describe the new bits, but I wonder whether I should
add a manpage specifically to detail the permissions system. It'll probably
be useful when more advanced subjects become available, such as for specific
UIDs and for containers-as-a-whole.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists