[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190822.141845.217313560870249775.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc: fw@...len.de, paul@...l-moore.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New skb extension for use by LSMs (skb "security blob")?
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:35:01 -0700
> If the secmark where replaced by a security blob, the u32 secmark field
> in an sk_buff would be replaced by a void * security field.
You can already use the secmark to hash to some kind of pointer or other
object.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists