netdev - Re: New skb extension for use by LSMs (skb "security blob")?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190822.153642.10800077338364583.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc:     fw@...len.de, paul@...l-moore.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New skb extension for use by LSMs (skb "security blob")?

From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:34:44 -0700

> On 8/22/2019 3:28 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
>> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:59:37 -0700
>>
>>> Sure, you *can* do that, but it would be insane to do so.
>> We look up the neighbour table entries on every single packet we
>> transmit from the kernel in the same exact way.
>>
>> And it was exactly to get rid of a pointer in a data structure.
> 
> I very much expect that the lifecycle management issues would
> be completely different, but I'll admit to having little understanding
> of the details of the neighbour table.

Neighbour table entries can live anywhere from essentially forever down
to several microseconds.

If your hash is good, and you use RCU locking on the read side, it's a
single pointer dereference in cost.