[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <423380ec-b999-d620-9bd6-78c2dabfde99@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:54:16 -0400
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bird-users@...work.cz,
Tom Bird <tom@...tfast.co.uk>,
Maria Jan Matejka <jan.matejka@....cz>,
Ondrej Zajicek <santiago@...reenet.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 routes inserted into the kernel with 'route' end up with
invalid type
On 8/23/19 8:43 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Hi David
>
> Tom noticed[0] that on newer kernels, the Bird routing daemon rejects IPv6
> routes received from the kernel if those routes were inserted with the
> old 'route' utility (i.e., when they're inserted through the ioctl
> interface).
>
> We tracked it down to the routes having an rtm_type of RTN_UNKNOWN, and
> a bit of git archaeology points suggestively at this commit:
>
> e8478e80e5a ("net/ipv6: Save route type in rt6_info")
>
> The same setup works with older kernels, so this seems like it's a
> regression, the age of 'route' notwithstanding. Any good ideas for the
> proper way to fix this?
>
Should be fixed by:
commit c7036d97acd2527cef145b5ef9ad1a37ed21bbe6
Author: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Date: Wed Jun 19 10:50:24 2019 -0700
ipv6: Default fib6_type to RTN_UNICAST when not set
A user reported that routes are getting installed with type 0
(RTN_UNSPEC)
where before the routes were RTN_UNICAST. One example is from accel-ppp
which apparently still uses the ioctl interface and does not set
rtmsg_type. Another is the netlink interface where ipv6 does not require
rtm_type to be set (v4 does). Prior to the commit in the Fixes tag the
ipv6 stack converted type 0 to RTN_UNICAST, so restore that behavior.
Fixes: e8478e80e5a7 ("net/ipv6: Save route type in rt6_info")
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists