| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190823055215.2658669-4-ast@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 22:52:14 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: verifier precise tests
Use BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to check that precision
tracking works as expected by comparing every step it takes.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 68 ++++++++--
.../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 44e2d640b088..d27fd929abb9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
#define UNPRIV_SYSCTL "kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled"
static bool unpriv_disabled = false;
static int skips;
+static bool verbose = false;
struct bpf_test {
const char *descr;
@@ -92,7 +93,8 @@ struct bpf_test {
enum {
UNDEF,
ACCEPT,
- REJECT
+ REJECT,
+ VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
} result, result_unpriv;
enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
uint8_t flags;
@@ -859,6 +861,36 @@ static int do_prog_test_run(int fd_prog, bool unpriv, uint32_t expected_val,
return 0;
}
+static bool cmp_str_seq(const char *log, const char *exp)
+{
+ char needle[80];
+ const char *p, *q;
+ int len;
+
+ do {
+ p = strchr(exp, '\t');
+ if (!p)
+ p = exp + strlen(exp);
+
+ len = p - exp;
+ if (len >= sizeof(needle) || !len) {
+ printf("FAIL\nTestcase bug\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+ strncpy(needle, exp, len);
+ needle[len] = 0;
+ q = strstr(log, needle);
+ if (!q) {
+ printf("FAIL\nUnexpected verifier log in successful load!\n"
+ "EXP: %s\nRES:\n", needle);
+ return false;
+ }
+ log = q + len;
+ exp = p + 1;
+ } while (*p);
+ return true;
+}
+
static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
int *passes, int *errors)
{
@@ -897,14 +929,20 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
pflags |= BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT;
if (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
pflags |= BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT;
+ if (test->flags & ~3)
+ pflags |= test->flags;
+ expected_ret = unpriv && test->result_unpriv != UNDEF ?
+ test->result_unpriv : test->result;
+ expected_err = unpriv && test->errstr_unpriv ?
+ test->errstr_unpriv : test->errstr;
memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
attr.prog_type = prog_type;
attr.expected_attach_type = test->expected_attach_type;
attr.insns = prog;
attr.insns_cnt = prog_len;
attr.license = "GPL";
- attr.log_level = 4;
+ attr.log_level = verbose || expected_ret == VERBOSE_ACCEPT ? 1 : 4;
attr.prog_flags = pflags;
fd_prog = bpf_load_program_xattr(&attr, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog));
@@ -914,14 +952,9 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
goto close_fds;
}
- expected_ret = unpriv && test->result_unpriv != UNDEF ?
- test->result_unpriv : test->result;
- expected_err = unpriv && test->errstr_unpriv ?
- test->errstr_unpriv : test->errstr;
-
alignment_prevented_execution = 0;
- if (expected_ret == ACCEPT) {
+ if (expected_ret == ACCEPT || expected_ret == VERBOSE_ACCEPT) {
if (fd_prog < 0) {
printf("FAIL\nFailed to load prog '%s'!\n",
strerror(errno));
@@ -932,6 +965,9 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
(test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS))
alignment_prevented_execution = 1;
#endif
+ if (expected_ret == VERBOSE_ACCEPT && !cmp_str_seq(bpf_vlog, expected_err)) {
+ goto fail_log;
+ }
} else {
if (fd_prog >= 0) {
printf("FAIL\nUnexpected success to load!\n");
@@ -957,6 +993,9 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
}
}
+ if (verbose)
+ printf(", verifier log:\n%s", bpf_vlog);
+
run_errs = 0;
run_successes = 0;
if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0) {
@@ -1097,17 +1136,24 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
unsigned int from = 0, to = ARRAY_SIZE(tests);
bool unpriv = !is_admin();
+ int arg = 1;
+
+ if (argc > 1 && strcmp(argv[1], "-v") == 0) {
+ arg++;
+ verbose = true;
+ argc--;
+ }
if (argc == 3) {
- unsigned int l = atoi(argv[argc - 2]);
- unsigned int u = atoi(argv[argc - 1]);
+ unsigned int l = atoi(argv[arg]);
+ unsigned int u = atoi(argv[arg + 1]);
if (l < to && u < to) {
from = l;
to = u + 1;
}
} else if (argc == 2) {
- unsigned int t = atoi(argv[argc - 1]);
+ unsigned int t = atoi(argv[arg]);
if (t < to) {
from = t;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a20953c23721
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+{
+ "precise: test 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_6, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, -8, 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_0),
+
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
+
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8), /* map_value_ptr -= map_value_ptr */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 1), /* R2=inv(umin=1, umax=8) */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
+ .result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
+ .errstr =
+ "26: (85) call bpf_probe_read#4\
+ last_idx 26 first_idx 20\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 25\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 24\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 23\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 22\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 20\
+ parent didn't have regs=4 stack=0 marks\
+ last_idx 19 first_idx 10\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 19\
+ regs=200 stack=0 before 18\
+ regs=300 stack=0 before 17\
+ regs=201 stack=0 before 15\
+ regs=201 stack=0 before 14\
+ regs=200 stack=0 before 13\
+ regs=200 stack=0 before 12\
+ regs=200 stack=0 before 11\
+ regs=200 stack=0 before 10\
+ parent already had regs=0 stack=0 marks",
+},
+{
+ "precise: test 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_6, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, -8, 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_0),
+
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
+
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8), /* map_value_ptr -= map_value_ptr */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 1), /* R2=inv(umin=1, umax=8) */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
+ .result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+ .errstr =
+ "26: (85) call bpf_probe_read#4\
+ last_idx 26 first_idx 22\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 25\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 24\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 23\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 22\
+ parent didn't have regs=4 stack=0 marks\
+ last_idx 20 first_idx 20\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 20\
+ parent didn't have regs=4 stack=0 marks\
+ last_idx 19 first_idx 17\
+ regs=4 stack=0 before 19\
+ regs=200 stack=0 before 18\
+ regs=300 stack=0 before 17\
+ parent already had regs=0 stack=0 marks",
+},
--
2.20.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists