[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190824.161522.2104135467992379374.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 16:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: andrew@...n.ch
Cc: rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] MAINTAINERS: Add phylink keyword to
SFF/SFP/SFP+ MODULE SUPPORT
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 00:34:54 +0200
> Russell king maintains phylink, as part of the SFP module support.
> However, much of the review work is about drivers swapping from phylib
> to phylink. Such changes don't make changes to the phylink core, and
> so the F: rules in MAINTAINERS don't match. Add a K:, keywork rule,
> which hopefully get_maintainers will match against for patches to MAC
> drivers swapping to phylink.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Applied to 'net', as I like to keep MAINTAINERS as uptodate as widely
as possible.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists