[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190824161328.GI32555@t480s.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 16:13:28 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
To: Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support Block
Address setting in hidden registers
Hi Marek,
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 23:26:02 +0200, Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz> wrote:
> -int mv88e6xxx_port_hidden_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int reg,
> - u16 val);
> +int mv88e6xxx_port_hidden_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int block, int port,
> + int reg, u16 val);
> int mv88e6xxx_port_hidden_wait(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip);
> -int mv88e6xxx_port_hidden_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int reg,
> - u16 *val);
> +int mv88e6xxx_port_hidden_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int block, int port,
> + int reg, u16 *val);
There's something I'm having trouble to follow here. This series keeps
adding and modifying its own code. Wouldn't it be simpler for everyone
if you directly implement the final mv88e6xxx_port_hidden_{read,write}
functions taking this block argument, and update the code to switch to it?
While at it, I don't really mind the "hidden" name, but is this the name
used in the documentation, if any?
Thank for you patience,
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists