[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190824222935.GG13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 23:29:35 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: dsa: mt7530: Convert to PHYLINK and
add support for port 5
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:45:44PM +0200, René van Dorst wrote:
> 1. net: dsa: mt7530: Convert to PHYLINK API
> This patch converts mt7530 to PHYLINK API.
> 2. dt-bindings: net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5
> 3. net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5
> These 2 patches adding support for port 5 of the switch.
>
> v1->v2:
> * Mostly phylink improvements after review.
> rfc -> v1:
> * Mostly phylink improvements after review.
> * Drop phy isolation patches. Adds no value for now.
> René van Dorst (3):
> net: dsa: mt7530: Convert to PHYLINK API
> dt-bindings: net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5
> net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mt7530.txt | 218 ++++++++++
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 371 +++++++++++++++---
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 61 ++-
> 3 files changed, 577 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
Having looked through this set of patches, I don't see anything
from the phylink point of view that concerns me. So, for the
series from the phylink perspective:
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Thanks.
I did notice a dev_info() in patch 3 that you may like to consider
whether they should be printed at info level or debug level. You
may keep my ack on the patch when fixing that.
I haven't considered whether the patch passes davem's style
requirements for networking code; what I spotted did look like
the declarations were upside-down christmas tree.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists