[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf0273fb-c272-72be-50f9-b25bb7c7f183@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 22:42:53 +0800
From: He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>
To: <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kafai@...com>,
<songliubraving@...com>, <yhs@...com>, <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>, <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<mst@...hat.com>, <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
<jpoimboe@...hat.com>, <liuxiaozhou@...edance.com>,
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
He Zhe <Zhe.He@...driver.com>
Subject: kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: ___bpf_prog_run.cold()+0x7: call
without frame pointer save/setup
Hi All,
Since 3193c0836f20 ("bpf: Disable GCC -fgcse optimization for ___bpf_prog_run()"),
We have got the following warning,
kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: ___bpf_prog_run.cold()+0x7: call without frame pointer save/setup
If reverting the above commit, we will get the following warning,
kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: ___bpf_prog_run()+0x8b9: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
if CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n, and no warning if CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y
Zhe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists