netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fully support SERDES on Topaz family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:27:17 +0200
From:   Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fully support
 SERDES on Topaz family

On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:38:30 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:

> > +static int mv88e6xxx_port_set_cmode(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
> > +				    phy_interface_t mode, bool allow_over_2500,
> > +				    bool make_cmode_writable)  
> 
> I don't like these two parameters. The caller of this function can do
> the check for allow_over_2500 and error out before calling this.
> 
> Is make_cmode_writable something that could be done once at probe and
> then forgotten about? Or is it needed before every write? At least
> move it into the specific port_set_cmode() that requires it.

It can be done once at probe. At first I thought about doing this in
setup_errata, but this is not an erratum. So shall I create a new
method for this in chip operations structure? Something like
port_additional_setup() ?

Marek