[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190826.141338.1571164902049647689.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: andrew@...n.ch
Cc: horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, allan.nielsen@...rochip.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add NETIF_F_HW_BR_CAP feature
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:38:11 +0200
> I'm still not convinced this is needed. The model is, the hardware is
> there to accelerate what Linux can do in software. Any peculiarities
> of the accelerator should be hidden in the driver. If the accelerator
> can do its job without needing promisc mode, do that in the driver.
I completely agree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists