[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ddd05712-e8c7-3c08-11c7-9840f5b64226@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:24:38 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, sthemmin@...rosoft.com, dcbw@...hat.com,
mkubecek@...e.cz, andrew@...n.ch, parav@...lanox.com,
saeedm@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next rfc 3/7] net: rtnetlink: add commands to add and
delete alternative ifnames
On 8/26/19 4:18 PM, David Miller wrote:
> I honestly think that the size of link dumps are out of hand as-is.
so you are suggesting new alternate names should not appear in kernel
generated RTM_NEWLINK messages - be it a link dump or a notification on
a change?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists