[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190826142107.092b7f08@nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:21:07 +0200
From: Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: create
serdes_get_lane chip operation
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:12:14 -0400
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com> wrote:
> In fact you're also relying on -ENODEV, which is what you return here (and in
> other places) instead of 0. So I'm afraid you have to address my comment now...
Vivien, you are right. I returned -ENODEV for Peridot when no lane was
to be on port. It should return 0.
I am sending v4 now with this corrected, and tested on Turris Mox with
combinations Peridot, Topaz and Peridot + Topaz.
Marek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists