netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] mdev: Make mdev alias unique among all mdevs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190827173937.3e39f578.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:39:37 +0200
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        "kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mdev: Make mdev alias unique among all mdevs

On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:28:55 -0600
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 13:29:46 +0200
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:08:59 +0000
> > Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 3:59 PM
> > > > To: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
> > > > Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com; Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>;
> > > > kwankhede@...dia.com; davem@...emloft.net; kvm@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> > > > kernel@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mdev: Make mdev alias unique among all mdevs
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:41:17 -0500
> > > > Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com> wrote:
> > > >       
> > > > > Mdev alias should be unique among all the mdevs, so that when such
> > > > > alias is used by the mdev users to derive other objects, there is no
> > > > > collision in a given system.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c | 5 +++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> > > > > b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c index e825ff38b037..6eb37f0c6369
> > > > > 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> > > > > @@ -375,6 +375,11 @@ int mdev_device_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct      
> > > > device *dev,      
> > > > >  			ret = -EEXIST;
> > > > >  			goto mdev_fail;
> > > > >  		}
> > > > > +		if (tmp->alias && strcmp(tmp->alias, alias) == 0) {      
> > > > 
> > > > Any way we can relay to the caller that the uuid was fine, but that we had a
> > > > hash collision? Duplicate uuids are much more obvious than a collision here.
> > > >       
> > > How do you want to relay this rare event?
> > > Netlink interface has way to return the error message back, but sysfs is limited due to its error code based interface.    
> > 
> > I don't know, that's why I asked :)
> > 
> > The problem is that "uuid already used" and "hash collision" are
> > indistinguishable. While "use a different uuid" will probably work in
> > both cases, "increase alias length" might be a good alternative in some
> > cases.
> > 
> > But if there is no good way to relay the problem, we can live with it.  
> 
> It's a rare event, maybe just dev_dbg(dev, "Hash collision creating alias \"%s\" for mdev device %pUl\n",...

Sounds good to me.