lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 20:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     olteanv@...il.com
Cc:     vivien.didelot@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] net: dsa: explicit programmation of
 VLAN on CPU ports

From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 21:27:23 +0300

> On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 20:25, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> When a VLAN is programmed on a user port, every switch of the fabric also
>> program the CPU ports and the DSA links as part of the VLAN. To do that,
>> DSA makes use of bitmaps to prepare all members of a VLAN.
>>
>> While this is expected for DSA links which are used as conduit between
>> interconnected switches, only the dedicated CPU port of the slave must be
>> programmed, not all CPU ports of the fabric. This may also cause problems in
>> other corners of DSA such as the tag_8021q.c driver, which needs to program
>> its ports manually, CPU port included.
>>
>> We need the dsa_port_vlan_{add,del} functions and its dsa_port_vid_{add,del}
>> variants to simply trigger the VLAN programmation without any logic in them,
>> but they may currently skip the operation based on the bridge device state.
>>
>> This patchset gets rid of the bitmap operations, and moves the bridge device
>> check as well as the explicit programmation of CPU ports where they belong,
>> in the slave code.
>>
>> While at it, clear the VLAN flags before programming a CPU port, as it
>> doesn't make sense to forward the PVID flag for example for such ports.
>>
>> Changes in v2: only clear the PVID flag.
 ...
> For the whole series:
> Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
> Thanks!

Series applied.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ