[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829153929.357e7391@ceranb>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:39:29 +0200
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, davem@...emloft.net,
allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] net: core: Notify on changes to
dev->promiscuity.
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:15:43 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> The problem with this is, the driver only gets called when promisc
> goes from 0 to !0. So, the port is added to the bridge. Promisc goes
> 0->1, and the driver gets called. We can evaluate as you said above,
> and leave the port filtering frames, not forwarding everything. When
> tcpdump is started, the core does promisc 1->2, but does not call into
> the driver. Also, currently sending a notification is not
> unconditional.
Hi Andrew,
got it. What about to change the existing notify call so NETDEV_CHANGE
notification will be also sent when (old_promiscuity !=
new_promiscuity)?
Ivan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists