[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829134722.528ecce1@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:47:22 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, capabilities: introduce CAP_BPF
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:19:24 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:34:34AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > As the above seems to favor the idea of CAP_TRACING allowing write
> > access to tracefs, should we have a CAP_TRACING_RO for just read access
> > and limited perf abilities?
>
> read only vs writeable is an attribute of the file system.
> Bringing such things into caps seem wrong to me.
So using groups then? I'm fine with that.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists