[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829202957.GL20113@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 22:29:57 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] netfilter: nf_tables: fib: Drop IPV6 packages if
IPv6 is disabled on boot
Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Thats a good point -- Leonardo, is the
> > "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables" sysctl on?
>
> Running
> # sudo sysctl -a
> I can see:
> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 1
>
> So this packets are sent to host iptables for processing?
Yes, this is an hold hack that was made because ebtables is
very feature-limited.
However, as I mentioned before I don't think there is anything
we can do here except audit all affected nft expressions and ip6tables
matches and add this check where needed. ip6t_rpfilter.c comes to mind.
In any case your patch looks ok to me.
> (Sorry for the delay, I did not received the previous e-mails.
> Please include me in to/cc.)
Sorry about that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists