lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829205832.GM20113@breakpoint.cc>
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 22:58:32 +0200
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] netfilter: nf_tables: fib: Drop IPV6 packages if
 IPv6 is disabled on boot

Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 17:04 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > > Thats a good point -- Leonardo, is the
> > > "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables" sysctl on?
> > 
> > Running
> > # sudo sysctl -a
> > I can see:
> > net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 1
> 
> Also, doing
> # echo 0 >  /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-ip6tables 
> And then trying to boot the guest will not crash the host.
> 
> Which would make sense, since host iptables is not dealing with guest
> IPv6 packets.

Yes.

> So, the real cause of this bug is the bridge making host ip6tables deal
> with guest IPv6 packets ? 
> If so, would it be ok if write a patch testing ipv6_mod_enabled()
> before passing guest ipv6 packets to host ip6tables? 

I'm not sure.  This switch is very old, it was added 10 years ago
in v2.6.31-rc1.

Even if we disable call-ip6tables in br_netfilter we will at least
in addition need a patch for nft_fib_netdev.c.

>From a "avoid calls to ipv6 stack when its disabled" standpoint,
the safest fix is to disable call-ip6tables functionality if ipv6
module is off *and* fix nft_fib_netdev.c to BREAK in ipv6 is off case.

I started to place a list of suspicous modules here, but that got out
of hand quickly.

So, given I don't want to plaster ipv6_mod_enabled() everywhere, I
would suggest this course of action:

1. add a patch to BREAK in nft_fib_netdev.c for !ipv6_mod_enabled()
2. change net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c, br_nf_pre_routing() to
   make sure ipv6_mod_enabled() is true before doing the ipv6 stack
   "emulation".

Makes sense?

Thanks,
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ