netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] dt-bindings: net: ethernet: Update mt7622 docs and dts to reflect the new phylink API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:03:33 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     opensource@...rst.com, john@...ozen.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
        nelson.chang@...iatek.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, frank-w@...lic-files.de, sr@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] dt-bindings: net: ethernet: Update mt7622
 docs and dts to reflect the new phylink API



On 28/08/2019 21:56, David Miller wrote:
> From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:29:45 +0200
> 
>> Thanks for taking this patch. For the next time, please make sure that dts[i]
>> patches are independent from the binding description, as dts[i] should go
>> through my tree. No problem for this round, just saying for the future.
> 
> That's not always possible nor reasonable, to be quite honest.
> 

Right now no case comes to my mind. What would be a case where this is not
reasonable or possible?

Regards,
Matthias