netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] net: core: Notify on changes to dev->promiscuity.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190830072133.GP2312@nanopsycho>
Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 09:21:33 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     idosch@...sch.org, andrew@...n.ch, horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, ivecera@...hat.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] net: core: Notify on changes to dev->promiscuity.

Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 09:12:23AM CEST, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:36:24 +0200
>
>> The promiscuity is a way to setup the rx filter. So promics == rx filter
>> off. For normal nics, where there is no hw fwd datapath,
>> this coincidentally means all received packets go to cpu.
>
>You cannot convince me that the HW datapath isn't a "rx filter" too, sorry.

If you look at it that way, then we have 2: rx_filter and hw_rx_filter.
The point is, those 2 are not one item, that is the point I'm trying to
make :/