[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190830090710.g7q2chf3qulfs5e4@salvia>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:07:10 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, vishal@...lsio.com, saeedm@...lanox.com,
jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 net-next] flow_offload: update mangle action
representation
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 06:54:48PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 02:53:32 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > * Offsets do not need to be on the 32-bits boundaries anymore. This
> > patchset adds front-end code to adjust the offset and length coming
> > from the tc pedit representation, so drivers get an exact header field
> > offset and length.
>
> But drivers use offsetof(start of field) to match headers, and I don't
> see you changing that. So how does this work then?
Drivers can only use offsetof() for fields that are on the 32-bits
boundary.
Before this patchset, if you want to mangle the destination port, then
the driver needs to refer to the source port offset and the length is
4 bytes, so the mask is telling what needs to be mangled.
After this patchset, the offset is set to the destination port, the
length is set to 2-bytes, and the mask is telling what bytes of the
destination port field you specifically want to update.
It's just 100 LOC of preprocessing that is simplifying driver
codebase.
> Say - I want to change the second byte of an IPv4 address.
Then, the front-end sets the offset to IPv4 address header field, and
the mask tells what to update.
> > * The front-end coalesces consecutive pedit actions into one single
> > word, so drivers can mangle IPv6 and ethernet address fields in one
> > single go.
>
> You still only coalesce up to 16 bytes, no?
You only have to rise FLOW_ACTION_MANGLE_MAXLEN coming in this patch
if you need more. I don't know of any packet field larger than 16
bytes. If there is a use-case for this, it should be easy to rise that
definition.
> As I said previously drivers will continue to implement mangle action
> merge code if that's the case. It'd be nice if core did the coalescing,
> and mark down first and last action, in case there is a setup cost for
> rewrite group.
In this patchset, the core front-end is doing the coalescing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists