netdev - Re: [PATCH] seccomp: fix compilation errors in seccomp-bpf kselftest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:09:20 -0600
From:   shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     Alakesh Haloi <alakesh.haloi@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: fix compilation errors in seccomp-bpf kselftest

On 8/22/19 3:58 PM, Alakesh Haloi wrote:
> Without this patch we see following error while building and kselftest
> for secccomp_bpf fails.
> 
> seccomp_bpf.c:1787:20: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY’ undeclared (first use in this function);
> seccomp_bpf.c:1788:6: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT’ undeclared (first use in this function);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alakesh Haloi <alakesh.haloi@...il.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 8 ++++++++
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> index 6ef7f16c4cf5..2e619760fc3e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> @@ -1353,6 +1353,14 @@ TEST_F(precedence, log_is_fifth_in_any_order)
>   #define PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP 7
>   #endif
>   
> +#ifndef PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY
> +#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY 1
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT
> +#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT 2
> +#endif
> +
>   #define IS_SECCOMP_EVENT(status) ((status >> 16) == PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP)
>   bool tracer_running;
>   void tracer_stop(int sig)
> 

Hi Kees,

Okay to apply this one for 5.4-rc1. Or is this going through bpf tree?
If it is going through bpf tree:

Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah