netdev - Re: [patch net-next rfc 3/7] net: rtnetlink: add commands to add and delete alternative ifnames

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 19:04:19 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>, dcbw@...hat.com,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, parav@...lanox.com,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        mlxsw <mlxsw@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next rfc 3/7] net: rtnetlink: add commands to add and
 delete alternative ifnames

Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 04:47:41PM CEST, dsahern@...il.com wrote:
>On 8/30/19 8:35 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:26 PM Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:36:41PM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> yes,  correct. I mentioned that because I was wondering if we can
>>>> think along the same lines for this API.
>>>> eg
>>>> (a) RTM_NEWLINK always replaces the list attribute
>>>> (b) RTM_SETLINK with NLM_F_APPEND always appends to the list attribute
>>>> (c) RTM_DELLINK with NLM_F_APPEND updates the list attribute
>>>>
>>>> (It could be NLM_F_UPDATE if NLM_F_APPEND sounds weird in the del
>>>> case. I have not looked at the full dellink path if it will work
>>>> neatly..its been a busy day )
>>>
>>> AFAICS rtnl_dellink() calls nlmsg_parse_deprecated() so that even
>>> current code would ignore any future attribute in RTM_DELLINK message
>>> (any kernel before the strict validation was introduced definitely will)
>>> and it does not seem to check NLM_F_APPEND or NLM_F_UPDATE either. So
>>> unless I missed something, such message would result in deleting the
>>> network device (if possible) with any kernel not implementing the
>>> feature.
>> 
>> ok, ack. yes today it does. I was hinting if that can be changed to
>> support list update with a flag like the RTM_DELLINK AF_BRIDGE does
>> for vlan list del.
>> 
>> so to summarize, i think we have discussed the following options to
>> update a netlink list attribute so far:
>> (a) encode an optional attribute/flag in the list attribute in
>> RTM_SETLINK to indicate if it is a add or del
>
>The ALT_IFNAME attribute could also be a struct that has both the string
>and a flag.

Not a struct, please :/

>
>> (b) Use a flag in RTM_SETLINK and RTM_DELINK to indicate add/del
>> (close to bridge vlan add/del)
>> (c) introduce a separate generic msg type to add/del to a list
>> attribute (IIUC this does need a separate msg type per subsystem or
>> netlink API)
>> 
>