[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190830.133335.323827182628557013.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: zdai@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zdai@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [v2] net_sched: act_police: add 2 new attributes to support
police 64bit rate and peakrate
From: "David Z. Dai" <zdai@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:03:52 -0500
> I have the impression that last parameter num value should be larger
> than the attribute num value in 2nd parameter (TC_POLICE_RATE64 in this
> case).
The argument in question is explicitly the "padding" value.
Please explain in detail where you got the impression that the
argument has to be larger?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists