[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190830.145516.687207471361740034.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/7] rxrpc: Fix use of skb_cow_data()
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:07:33 +0100
> Here's a series of patches that replaces the use of skb_cow_data() in rxrpc
> with skb_unshare() early on in the input process. The problem that is
> being seen is that skb_cow_data() indirectly requires that the maximum
> usage count on an sk_buff be 1, and it may generate an assertion failure in
> pskb_expand_head() if not.
>
> This can occur because rxrpc_input_data() may be still holding a ref when
> it has just attached the sk_buff to the rx ring and given that attachment
> its own ref. If recvmsg happens fast enough, skb_cow_data() can see the
> ref still held by the softirq handler.
>
> Further, a packet may contain multiple subpackets, each of which gets its
> own attachment to the ring and its own ref - also making skb_cow_data() go
> bang.
>
> Fix this by:
...
> There are also patches to improve the rxrpc_skb tracepoint to make sure
> that Tx-derived buffers are identified separately from Rx-derived buffers
> in the trace.
This looks great, thanks for reimplementing this using skb_unshare().
> The patches are tagged here:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git
> rxrpc-fixes-20190827
Pulled, thanks again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists