netdev - Re: [PATCH 4.14] tcp: fix tcp_rtx_queue_tail in case of empty retransmit queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:26:57 -0700
From:   Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>
To:     Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     Tim Froidcoeur <tim.froidcoeur@...sares.net>,
        matthieu.baerts@...sares.net, aprout@...mit.edu,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, jtl@...flix.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mkubecek@...e.cz,
        ncardwell@...gle.com, sashal@...nel.org, ycheng@...gle.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14] tcp: fix tcp_rtx_queue_tail in case of empty
 retransmit queue

Hello,

On 24/08/19 - 15:05:20, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23 Aug 2019, at 23:03, Tim Froidcoeur wrote:
> 
> > Commit 8c3088f895a0 ("tcp: be more careful in tcp_fragment()")
> > triggers following stack trace:
> >
> > [25244.848046] kernel BUG at ./include/linux/skbuff.h:1406!
> > [25244.859335] RIP: 0010:skb_queue_prev+0x9/0xc
> > [25244.888167] Call Trace:
> > [25244.889182]  <IRQ>
> > [25244.890001]  tcp_fragment+0x9c/0x2cf
> > [25244.891295]  tcp_write_xmit+0x68f/0x988
> > [25244.892732]  __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x3b/0xa0
> > [25244.894347]  tcp_data_snd_check+0x2a/0xc8
> > [25244.895775]  tcp_rcv_established+0x2a8/0x30d
> > [25244.897282]  tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb2/0x158
> > [25244.898666]  tcp_v4_rcv+0x692/0x956
> > [25244.899959]  ip_local_deliver_finish+0xeb/0x169
> > [25244.901547]  __netif_receive_skb_core+0x51c/0x582
> > [25244.903193]  ? inet_gro_receive+0x239/0x247
> > [25244.904756]  netif_receive_skb_internal+0xab/0xc6
> > [25244.906395]  napi_gro_receive+0x8a/0xc0
> > [25244.907760]  receive_buf+0x9a1/0x9cd
> > [25244.909160]  ? load_balance+0x17a/0x7b7
> > [25244.910536]  ? vring_unmap_one+0x18/0x61
> > [25244.911932]  ? detach_buf+0x60/0xfa
> > [25244.913234]  virtnet_poll+0x128/0x1e1
> > [25244.914607]  net_rx_action+0x12a/0x2b1
> > [25244.915953]  __do_softirq+0x11c/0x26b
> > [25244.917269]  ? handle_irq_event+0x44/0x56
> > [25244.918695]  irq_exit+0x61/0xa0
> > [25244.919947]  do_IRQ+0x9d/0xbb
> > [25244.921065]  common_interrupt+0x85/0x85
> > [25244.922479]  </IRQ>
> >
> > tcp_rtx_queue_tail() (called by tcp_fragment()) can call
> > tcp_write_queue_prev() on the first packet in the queue, which will trigger
> > the BUG in tcp_write_queue_prev(), because there is no previous packet.
> >
> > This happens when the retransmit queue is empty, for example in case of a
> > zero window.
> >
> > Patch is needed for 4.4, 4.9 and 4.14 stable branches.
> >
> > Fixes: 8c3088f895a0 ("tcp: be more careful in tcp_fragment()")
> > Change-Id: I839bde7167ae59e2f7d916c913507372445765c5
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Froidcoeur <tim.froidcoeur@...sares.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>

just checking in, if the patch is getting picked up for -stable ?

(I don't see it in the stable-queue)


Thanks,
Christoph