[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <41769d6033d27d629798e060671a3b21f22e2a21.1567437861.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 23:24:21 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] sctp: use transport pf_retrans in sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike
Transport should use its own pf_retrans to do the error_count
check, instead of asoc's. Otherwise, it's meaningless to make
pf_retrans per transport.
Fixes: 5aa93bcf66f4 ("sctp: Implement quick failover draft from tsvwg")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
index 1cf5bb5..e52b212 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_cmd_seq *commands,
if (net->sctp.pf_enable &&
(transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) &&
(transport->error_count < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
- (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
+ (transport->error_count > transport->pf_retrans)) {
sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, transport,
SCTP_TRANSPORT_PF,
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists