[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd6b7a9b-59a7-143a-0d5f-e73069d9295d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 20:18:19 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
Cc: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-ipv6: fix excessive RTF_ADDRCONF flag on ::1/128
local route (and others)
On 9/1/19 8:12 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> Not sure if this patch is the right fix, though, because it breaks
> things in the opposite direction: even routes created by an IPv6
> address added by receiving an RA will no longer have RTF_ADDRCONF.
> Perhaps add something like this as well?
>
> struct fib6_info *addrconf_f6i_alloc(struct net *net, struct inet6_dev *idev,
> - const struct in6_addr *addr, bool anycast,
> - const struct in6_addr *addr, u8 flags,
> gfp_t gfp_flags);
>
> flags would be RTF_ANYCAST iff the code previously called with true,
> and RTF_ADDRCONF if called by a function that is adding an IPv6
> address coming from an RA.
addrconf_f6i_alloc is used for addresses added by userspace
(ipv6_add_addr) and anycast. ie., from what I can see it is not used for RAs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists