lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29EC5179-D939-42CD-8577-682BE4B05916@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 03 Sep 2019 14:55:17 -0700
From:   "Jonathan Lemon" <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
To:     Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: rtnl_lock() question

How appropriate is it to hold the rtnl_lock() across a sleepable
memory allocation?  On one hand it's just a mutex, but it would
seem like it could block quite a few things.
-- 
Jonathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ