netdev - [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: precision tracking tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190903225133.821243-1-ast@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:51:33 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: precision tracking tests

Add two tests to check that stack slot marking during backtracking
doesn't trigger 'spi > allocated_stack' warning.
One test is using BPF_ST insn. Another is using BPF_STX.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
these tests depend on the fix https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1157368/
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c  | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
index a455a4a71f11..02151f8c940f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
@@ -140,3 +140,55 @@
 	.errstr = "!read_ok",
 	.result = REJECT,
 },
+{
+	"precise: ST insn causing spi > allocated_stack",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, 123, 0),
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, -8, 0),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -1),
+	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+	.flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+	.errstr = "5: (2d) if r4 > r0 goto pc+0\
+	last_idx 5 first_idx 5\
+	parent didn't have regs=10 stack=0 marks\
+	last_idx 4 first_idx 2\
+	regs=10 stack=0 before 4\
+	regs=10 stack=0 before 3\
+	regs=0 stack=1 before 2\
+	last_idx 5 first_idx 5\
+	parent didn't have regs=1 stack=0 marks",
+	.result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
+	.retval = -1,
+},
+{
+	"precise: STX insn causing spi > allocated_stack",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, 123, 0),
+	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -1),
+	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+	.flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+	.errstr = "last_idx 6 first_idx 6\
+	parent didn't have regs=10 stack=0 marks\
+	last_idx 5 first_idx 3\
+	regs=10 stack=0 before 5\
+	regs=10 stack=0 before 4\
+	regs=0 stack=1 before 3\
+	last_idx 6 first_idx 6\
+	parent didn't have regs=1 stack=0 marks\
+	last_idx 5 first_idx 3\
+	regs=1 stack=0 before 5",
+	.result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
+	.retval = -1,
+},
-- 
2.20.0