| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190904184009.15070-1-ap420073@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 03:40:09 +0900
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, jiri@...nulli.us,
sd@...asysnail.net, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, saeedm@...lanox.com,
manishc@...vell.com, rahulv@...vell.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com, sashal@...nel.org,
hare@...e.de, varun@...lsio.com, ubraun@...ux.ibm.com,
kgraul@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: ap420073@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH net 06/11] macsec: use dynamic lockdep key instead of subclass
All macsec device has same lockdep key and subclass is initialized with
nest_level.
But actual nest_level value can be changed when a lower device is attached.
And at this moment, the subclass should be updated but it seems to be
unsafe.
So this patch makes macsec use dynamic lockdep key instead of the subclass.
Test commands:
ip link add bond0 type bond
ip link add dummy0 type dummy
ip link add macsec0 link bond0 type macsec
ip link add macsec1 link dummy0 type macsec
ip link set bond0 mtu 1000
ip link set macsec1 master bond0
ip link set bond0 up
ip link set macsec0 up
ip link set dummy0 up
ip link set macsec1 up
Splat looks like:
[ 146.540123] ============================================
[ 146.540123] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 146.540123] 5.3.0-rc7+ #322 Not tainted
[ 146.540123] --------------------------------------------
[ 146.540123] ip/1340 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 146.540123] 00000000446fd8bd (&macsec_netdev_addr_lock_key/1){+...}, at: dev_uc_sync_multiple+0xfa/0x1a0
[ 146.540123]
[ 146.540123] but task is already holding lock:
[ 146.540123] 00000000a9ab6378 (&macsec_netdev_addr_lock_key/1){+...}, at: dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[ 146.540123]
[ 146.540123] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 146.540123] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 146.540123]
[ 146.540123] CPU0
[ 146.540123] ----
[ 146.540123] lock(&macsec_netdev_addr_lock_key/1);
[ 146.540123] lock(&macsec_netdev_addr_lock_key/1);
[ 146.623155]
[ 146.623155] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 146.623155]
[ 146.623155] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 146.623155]
[ 146.623155] 4 locks held by ip/1340:
[ 146.623155] #0: 0000000026436ef0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x466/0x8a0
[ 146.623155] #1: 00000000a9ab6378 (&macsec_netdev_addr_lock_key/1){+...}, at: dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[ 146.623155] #2: 00000000a8947dd0 (&dev_addr_list_lock_key/3){+...}, at: dev_mc_sync+0xfa/0x1a0
[ 146.623155] #3: 00000000b62011e9 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: bond_set_rx_mode+0x5/0x3c0 [bonding]
[ 146.674970]
[ 146.674970] stack backtrace:
[ 146.687145] CPU: 0 PID: 1340 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.3.0-rc7+ #322
[ 146.693024] Call Trace:
[ 146.693024] dump_stack+0x7c/0xbb
[ 146.693024] __lock_acquire+0x26a9/0x3de0
[ 146.693024] ? register_lock_class+0x14d0/0x14d0
[ 146.693024] ? register_lock_class+0x14d0/0x14d0
[ 146.693024] lock_acquire+0x164/0x3b0
[ 146.693024] ? dev_uc_sync_multiple+0xfa/0x1a0
[ 146.693024] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x2e/0x60
[ 146.693024] ? dev_uc_sync_multiple+0xfa/0x1a0
[ 146.693024] dev_uc_sync_multiple+0xfa/0x1a0
[ 146.693024] bond_set_rx_mode+0x269/0x3c0 [bonding]
[ 146.751163] ? bond_init+0x6f0/0x6f0 [bonding]
[ 146.757006] ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0xa9/0x170
[ 146.757006] dev_mc_sync+0x15a/0x1a0
[ 146.757006] macsec_dev_set_rx_mode+0x3a/0x50 [macsec]
[ 146.757006] dev_set_rx_mode+0x21/0x30
[ 146.757006] __dev_open+0x202/0x310
[ 146.757006] ? dev_set_rx_mode+0x30/0x30
[ 146.757006] ? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xe0
[ 146.757006] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xe9/0x1b0
[ 146.757006] __dev_change_flags+0x3c3/0x500
[ 146.757006] ? dev_set_allmulti+0x10/0x10
[ 146.757006] ? sched_clock_local+0xd4/0x140
[ 146.757006] ? check_chain_key+0x236/0x5d0
[ 146.757006] dev_change_flags+0x7a/0x160
[ 146.757006] do_setlink+0xa26/0x2f20
[ 146.757006] ? sched_clock_local+0xd4/0x140
[ ... ]
Fixes: e20038724552 ("macsec: fix lockdep splats when nesting devices")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/macsec.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/macsec.c b/drivers/net/macsec.c
index 8f46aa1ddec0..25a4fc88145d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c
@@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ struct macsec_dev {
struct pcpu_secy_stats __percpu *stats;
struct list_head secys;
struct gro_cells gro_cells;
+ struct lock_class_key xmit_lock_key;
+ struct lock_class_key addr_lock_key;
unsigned int nest_level;
};
@@ -2749,7 +2751,32 @@ static netdev_tx_t macsec_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
#define MACSEC_FEATURES \
(NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_FRAGLIST)
-static struct lock_class_key macsec_netdev_addr_lock_key;
+
+static void macsec_dev_set_lockdep_one(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct netdev_queue *txq,
+ void *_unused)
+{
+ struct macsec_dev *macsec = macsec_priv(dev);
+
+ lockdep_set_class(&txq->_xmit_lock, &macsec->xmit_lock_key);
+}
+
+static struct lock_class_key qdisc_tx_busylock_key;
+static struct lock_class_key qdisc_running_key;
+
+static void macsec_dev_set_lockdep_class(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct macsec_dev *macsec = macsec_priv(dev);
+
+ dev->qdisc_tx_busylock = &qdisc_tx_busylock_key;
+ dev->qdisc_running_key = &qdisc_running_key;
+
+ lockdep_register_key(&macsec->addr_lock_key);
+ lockdep_set_class(&dev->addr_list_lock, &macsec->addr_lock_key);
+
+ lockdep_register_key(&macsec->xmit_lock_key);
+ netdev_for_each_tx_queue(dev, macsec_dev_set_lockdep_one, NULL);
+}
static int macsec_dev_init(struct net_device *dev)
{
@@ -2780,6 +2807,7 @@ static int macsec_dev_init(struct net_device *dev)
if (is_zero_ether_addr(dev->broadcast))
memcpy(dev->broadcast, real_dev->broadcast, dev->addr_len);
+ macsec_dev_set_lockdep_class(dev);
return 0;
}
@@ -2789,6 +2817,9 @@ static void macsec_dev_uninit(struct net_device *dev)
gro_cells_destroy(&macsec->gro_cells);
free_percpu(dev->tstats);
+
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&macsec->addr_lock_key);
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&macsec->xmit_lock_key);
}
static netdev_features_t macsec_fix_features(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -3263,10 +3294,6 @@ static int macsec_newlink(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
dev_hold(real_dev);
macsec->nest_level = dev_get_nest_level(real_dev) + 1;
- netdev_lockdep_set_classes(dev);
- lockdep_set_class_and_subclass(&dev->addr_list_lock,
- &macsec_netdev_addr_lock_key,
- macsec_get_nest_level(dev));
err = netdev_upper_dev_link(real_dev, dev, extack);
if (err < 0)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists