[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190904061501.GB3838@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 08:15:01 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/skbuff: silence warnings under memory pressure
Cc printk maintainers
On Tue 03-09-19 17:42:28, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > I suppose what happens is those skb_build() allocations are from softirq,
> > > and
> > > once one of them failed, it calls printk() which generates more interrupts.
> > > Hence, the infinite loop.
> >
> > Please elaborate more.
> >
>
> If you look at the original report, the failed allocation dump_stack() is,
>
> <IRQ>
> warn_alloc.cold.43+0x8a/0x148
> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1a5c/0x1bb0
> alloc_pages_current+0x9c/0x110
> allocate_slab+0x34a/0x11f0
> new_slab+0x46/0x70
> ___slab_alloc+0x604/0x950
> __slab_alloc+0x12/0x20
> kmem_cache_alloc+0x32a/0x400
> __build_skb+0x23/0x60
> build_skb+0x1a/0xb0
> igb_clean_rx_irq+0xafc/0x1010 [igb]
> igb_poll+0x4bb/0xe30 [igb]
> net_rx_action+0x244/0x7a0
> __do_softirq+0x1a0/0x60a
> irq_exit+0xb5/0xd0
> do_IRQ+0x81/0x170
> common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
> </IRQ>
>
> Since it has no __GFP_NOWARN to begin with, it will call,
>
> printk
> vprintk_default
> vprintk_emit
> wake_up_klogd
> irq_work_queue
> __irq_work_queue_local
> arch_irq_work_raise
> apic->send_IPI_self(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR)
> smp_irq_work_interrupt
> exiting_irq
> irq_exit
>
> and end up processing pending net_rx_action softirqs again which are plenty due
> to connected via ssh etc.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists