netdev - Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hidp: Fix error checks in hidp_get/set_raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190906101306.GA12017@kadam>
Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 13:13:06 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Dan Elkouby <streetwalkermc@...il.com>
Cc:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Fabian Henneke <fabian.henneke@...il.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hidp: Fix error checks in
 hidp_get/set_raw_report

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 12:41:57PM +0300, Dan Elkouby wrote:
> Commit 48d9cc9d85dd ("Bluetooth: hidp: Let hidp_send_message return
> number of queued bytes") changed hidp_send_message to return non-zero
> values on success, which some other bits did not expect. This caused
> spurious errors to be propagated through the stack, breaking some (all?)
> drivers, such as hid-sony for the Dualshock 4 in Bluetooth mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Elkouby <streetwalkermc@...il.com>

I think we also need to update update ms_ff_worker() which assumes that
hid_hw_output_report() returns zero on success.  Please use the Fixes
tag for this since a lot of scripts rely on it to decide what to
backport.

Fixes: 48d9cc9d85dd ("Bluetooth: hidp: Let hidp_send_message return number of queued bytes")

Otherwise, it looks good.  Thanks for catching this.

regards,
dan carpenter