[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd2ed116-4b19-73b2-a3f0-4377cc0f2db3@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 20:51:29 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgg@...lanox.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, jglisse@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost: re-introducing metadata acceleration through
kernel virtual address
On 2019/9/6 上午11:21, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 20:27:36 +0800 From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> +static void vhost_set_map_dirty(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> + struct vhost_map *map, int index)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_uaddr *uaddr = &vq->uaddrs[index];
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if (uaddr->write) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < map->npages; i++)
>> + set_page_dirty(map->pages[i]);
>> + }
> Not sure need to set page dirty under page lock.
Just to make sure I understand the issue. Do you mean there's no need
for set_page_dirty() here? If yes, is there any other function that
already did this?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists