[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190907053000.23869-2-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 22:29:57 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
davejwatson@...com, borisp@...lanox.com, aviadye@...lanox.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net/tls: unref frags in order
It's generally more cache friendly to walk arrays in order,
especially those which are likely not in cache.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com>
---
net/tls/tls_device.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_device.c b/net/tls/tls_device.c
index 41c106e45f01..285c9f9e94e4 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_device.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_device.c
@@ -122,13 +122,10 @@ static struct net_device *get_netdev_for_sock(struct sock *sk)
static void destroy_record(struct tls_record_info *record)
{
- int nr_frags = record->num_frags;
- skb_frag_t *frag;
+ int i;
- while (nr_frags-- > 0) {
- frag = &record->frags[nr_frags];
- __skb_frag_unref(frag);
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < record->num_frags; i++)
+ __skb_frag_unref(&record->frags[i]);
kfree(record);
}
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists