lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 7 Sep 2019 04:24:49 +0300
From:   Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, yhs@...com,
        davem@...emloft.net, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, hawk@...nel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] samples: bpf: Makefile: base progs build on
 Makefile.progs

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 04:34:31PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 12:22:12AM +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>> +
>> +If need to use environment of target board, the SYSROOT also can be set,
>> +pointing on FS of target board:
>> +
>> +make samples/bpf/ LLC=~/git/llvm/build/bin/llc \
>> +     CLANG=~/git/llvm/build/bin/clang \
>> +     SYSROOT=~/some_sdk/linux-devkit/sysroots/aarch64-linux-gnu
>
>Patches 7 and 8 look quite heavy. I don't have a way to test them
>which makes me a bit uneasy to accept them as-is.
>Would be great if somebody could give Tested-by.
>
I can try to split patch 8 in v2, but not significantly.

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk

Powered by blists - more mailing lists