lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 04:24:49 +0300 From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org> To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, yhs@...com, davem@...emloft.net, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] samples: bpf: Makefile: base progs build on Makefile.progs On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 04:34:31PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 12:22:12AM +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: >> + >> +If need to use environment of target board, the SYSROOT also can be set, >> +pointing on FS of target board: >> + >> +make samples/bpf/ LLC=~/git/llvm/build/bin/llc \ >> + CLANG=~/git/llvm/build/bin/clang \ >> + SYSROOT=~/some_sdk/linux-devkit/sysroots/aarch64-linux-gnu > >Patches 7 and 8 look quite heavy. I don't have a way to test them >which makes me a bit uneasy to accept them as-is. >Would be great if somebody could give Tested-by. > I can try to split patch 8 in v2, but not significantly. -- Regards, Ivan Khoronzhuk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists